DOE IG blasts DOE for not producing renewable energy on federal land

Published: Thu, 05/03/12

  
The DOE IG in a report highlighted what ECA members have told DOE for years, they talk about renewable energy but do not do projects on DOE land.  Several companies and communities have attempted to develop renewable energy projects on DOE land but DOE does not promote such activities.  Even where a community finances the project themselves, DOE can ignore the project.  The ARI (energy parks) project was developed to address these needs and it is time for DOE to support the program and promote the development of renewable energy on DOE sites -- especially EM and NNSA sites.  DOE should follow the model of the Department of Defense (DOD) and promote renewable energy development on DOE sites.
 
Specifically, the IG stated:
1. Despite EPAct's preference for producing renewable energy on Federal lands, the Department relied almost exclusively on purchases of renewable energy. In fact, in FY 2010, on-site renewable energy generation represented less than 1 percent of total electricity consumed Department-wide. The lack of large-scale on-site projects occurred, at least in part, because of the challenges the Department faced in financing renewable energy projects;
 
2. Sites may not have always purchased renewable energy in the most cost-effective manner. In particular, we noted significant variability in the costs sites paid to purchase renewable energy-- ranging from $0.44 to $26.67 per megawatt hour. The cost variability we noted was often a result of the sites' lack of awareness about available purchasing options and was not generally based on a detailed cost analysis of options that identified the best value. Additionally, the Department guidance on renewable energy purchases did not provide sites with advice regarding how to evaluate the different purchase options to ensure procurement at the best value; and,
 
3. The Department had not ensured its sites reported consistent and accurate renewable energy data. For example, some sites inaccurately reported either the megawatt hours or the cost of renewable energy purchased. We noted that the Department's guidance did not provide detailed instructions to site officials concerning data input. However, it is important to note that the Department's achievement of EPAct's energy usage goals was not affected by the errors.
 

Court Urged to Order Decision on Nuclear Waste Site
Matthew L. Wald, The New York Times
May 2, 2012
 
WASHINGTON -- Two states with large amounts of military and civilian nuclear waste told a federal court panel on Wednesday that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission was flouting the law by declining to decide whether the Nevada desert is a suitable burial spot -- even if the Obama administration says the storage plan is dead.
 
Congress decided 25 years ago that the Department of Energy should build a repository for nuclear waste at Yucca Mountain, a volcanic ridge in Nevada 100 miles from Las Vegas, if the regulatory commission determined the site to be suitable. But the commission decided last year to end its consideration, with the chairman, Gregory B. Jaczko, pointing out that Congress was no longer providing money to advance the project.
 
The Department of Energy had formally moved to withdraw its proposal for the storage site. In his 2008 run for the presidency, President Obama promised to shelve the project, which is bitterly opposed by the Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, a Democrat from Nevada.
 
South Carolina, Washington and several other plaintiffs sued the federal government, arguing that the nuclear commission had a legal responsibility to pass judgment on Yucca. On Wednesday, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit heard arguments from both sides.
 
"We will never have a nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain or elsewhere if the executive does not follow the laws," said Andrew Fitz, a Washington State assistant attorney general. 
 
 
 
More Information
 
 
 
 
 
To help ensure that you receive all email with images correctly displayed, please add ecabulletin@aweber.com to your address book or contact list  
ECA Bulletin 
Browse previous editions of the ECA Bulletin